[Hospitalary concurrent exercise program in overweight and obese school students and adolescents during COVID-19 pandemic]. / Programa de ejercicio concurrente hospitalario en escolares y adolescentes con sobrepeso y obesidad durante la pandemia COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic reduced daily physical activity in the pediatric population, with deleterious effects on anthropometry, muscle function, aerobic capacity, and metabolic control. OBJECTIVE: Determine the changes in anthropometry, aerobic capacity, muscle function, and metabolic control of a 12-week concurrent training protocol in overweight and obese children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic. PATIENTS AND METHOD: 24 patients participated and were divided into groups once a week (12S; n = 10) and twice a week (24S; n = 14). Anthropometry, muscle function, aerobic capacity, and metabolic biochemical tests were evaluated before and after the application of the concurrent training plan. Two-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Fisher's post hoc test were used. RESULTS: Only the twice times week training improved the anthropometrics parameters (BMI - z, waist circumference and waist to height ratio). The muscle function tests (push up, standing broad jump and prone plank), improved in both groups such as the aerobic capacity measured by VO2maximo and the runned distance in Shuttle 20m run test. The HOMA index only improved with twice times week training without changes in lipid profile in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The 12S and 24S groups improved aerobic capacity and muscular function. Only the 24S improved anthropometric parameters and the HOMA index.

Satisfaction with modes of telemedicine delivery during COVID-19: A randomized, single-blind, parallel group, noninferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about satisfaction with different modes of telemedicine delivery. The objective of this study was to determine whether patient satisfaction with phone-only was noninferior to video visits. METHODS: We conducted a parallel group, randomized (1:1), single-blind, noninferiority trial in multispecialty clinics at a tertiary academic medical center. Adults age ≥ 60 years or with Medicare/Medicaid insurance were eligible. Primary outcome was visit satisfaction rate (9 or 10 on a 0-10 satisfaction scale). Noninferiority was determined if satisfaction with phone-only (intervention) versus video visits (comparator) was no worse by a -15% prespecified noninferiority margin. We performed modified intent-to-treat (mITT) and per protocol analyses, after adjusting for age and insurance. RESULTS: 200 participants, 43% Black, 68% women completed surveys. Visit satisfaction rates were high. In the mITT analysis, phone-only visits were noninferior by an adjusted difference of 3.2% (95% CI, -7.6% to 14%). In the per protocol analysis, phone-only were noninferior by an adjusted difference of -4.1% (95% CI, -14.8% to 6.6%). The proportion of participants who indicated they preferred the same type of telemedicine visit as their next clinic visit were similar (30.2% vs 27.9% video vs phone-only, p = 0.78) and a majority said their medical concerns were addressed and would recommend a telemedicine visit. CONCLUSIONS: Among a group of diverse, established older or underserved patients, the satisfaction rate for phone-only was noninferior to video visits. These findings could impact practice and policies governing telemedicine.